<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Scientific Consensus Continues to Support CWF in Brain Health</title>
    <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/2048296#M1045</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;CarryAnne –&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;You still have not answered my questions.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; You simply provided more quotes (personal opinions) from &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;EM&gt;dozens &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;EM&gt;of individual doctors, dentists and scientists who have studied emerging scientific data and changed their minds&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt; and claimed (personal anecdotes) that, &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;EM&gt;many more [doctors, dentists and scientists]… &lt;STRONG&gt;admit that they know fluoridation is ineffective and harmful&lt;/STRONG&gt; to some consumers but they won't speak publicly because of fear of retaliation from abusive fluoride trolls, their rabidly pro-fluoride peers, and even their patients&lt;/EM&gt;.” (08-22-2018 06:59 AM)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wow, you are claiming these&amp;nbsp;doctors, dentists and scientists actually have credible proof that &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;EM&gt;fluoridation is ineffective and harmful&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt; (scientific evidence &amp;amp;/or evidence from their own practices), and yet they choose not to publically speak out and try to change the scientific consensus?&amp;nbsp; &lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Those are serious accusations that these health professionals are failing to uphold their professional and moral responsibilities.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You stated (07-07-2018 04:49 PM), &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;EM&gt;This thread was begun to share both &lt;STRONG&gt;personal stories&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;[anecdotes]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;EM&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;modern scientific evidence of harm&lt;/STRONG&gt; from fluoridation policy in order to collect data for AARP&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt; and (07-20-2018 10:02 AM) &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;EM&gt;This thread is supposed to facilitate&amp;nbsp; discussion among seniors who have found fluoridation causes illness or worsens their health&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt; and you&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt; “&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Demand &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;AARP Take Action&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt; and (08-10-2018 10:13 AM) &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;advocate for its constituency and craft a policy statement opposed to fluoridation, which is&lt;/FONT&gt; [in your opinion] &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;mass medication using municipal water&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;It is obvious that you have no interest in an impartial, rational discussion of the scientifically established benefits and risks of fluoridation.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Challenging the prevailing scientific consensus is one of the foundations of the scientific method.&amp;nbsp; The only way science has progressed over the last few hundred years is by adjusting (sometimes reversing) the consensus of the relevant scientific communities as new, legitimate, reproducible evidence is discovered and evaluated.&amp;nbsp; Yes, individual personal biases and sinister motives are possible, and they can influence the way evidence is interpreted.&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt; These all too human traits are precisely why the consensus of relevant experts is critical to science – to&amp;nbsp;identify conclusions based primarily on personal (or group) biases, greed, etc. and enable evidence-based decisions to be made.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, you still have not provided a rational explanation of why, if fluoridation opponents (FOs) actually have legitimate scientific evidence to support their claims of harm, the scientific consensus that fluoridation is a safe and effective public health measure has not changed in over 70 years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By scientific consensus, I mean that the majority of relevant experts in a given scientific field agree on the interpretation of the available body of evidence.&amp;nbsp; The fact that the hundreds of thousand members of over 100 nationally and internationally recognized science and health organizations have not rebelled over the last 70+ years of community water fluoridation (CWF) while those organizations publically recognize the benefits of CWF, is a clear example of a scientific consensus.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In contrast, you listed a group of 13 alternate health, environmental, spiritual and cultural organizations (06-28-2018 07:32 AM) that oppose CWF.&amp;nbsp; That is only a demonstration of the fact that there are always minority opinions whose proponents have been unsuccessful at providing credible scientific evidence to change the majority consensus.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Apparently I need to be more specific in my questions about what you believe constitutes the scientific consensus:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q1)&amp;nbsp; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Do you accept the fact that the support of CWF by virtually all nationally and internationally recognized science and health organizations constitutes the scientific consensus that fluoridation is safe and effective?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;YES or NO&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q1A) &lt;U&gt;If your response is NO, then answer the following questions:&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You claimed (08-21-2018 01:14 PM)&lt;STRONG&gt; “&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Consensus is a political construct that validates there are no substantial objections. There is and has always been substantial scientific objections to fluoridation. Therefore, there is not now nor has ever been any consensus of safety&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt; If your claim has any validity whatever, explain and document exactly how this “&lt;EM&gt;political construct&lt;/EM&gt;” has caused virtually all the major science and health organizations to reject what FOs consider to be legitimate evidence and continue to support CWF?&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; There are always objections to any scientific consensus – that is how scientific knowledge and theories evolve.&amp;nbsp; It is the responsibility of those who hold those outlier beliefs to prove their claims with legitimate, conclusive, reproducible evidence.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Explain what you believe the scientific consensus in regard to fluoridation actually is and how it is different from the consensus&amp;nbsp;for other science and health issues.&lt;/FONT&gt; Or if you, like some other FOs, don’t believe the scientific consensus is real or relevant to all specific areas of science and evidence-based health care, then explain exactly the processes the minority of science/health trained FOs employ to determine what constitutes legitimate scientific evidence and how it should be interpreted.&amp;nbsp; From the anti-F comments and “evidence” provided, it seems as though only those studies that fit (or can be ‘adjusted’ to fit) a pre-determined fixed-belief are considered valid.&amp;nbsp; As I noted earlier (08-21-2018 09:36 PM), all “evidence” provided by FOs to date has relatively easily recognized and described flaws.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Do you recognize as valid any of the health conclusions and recommendations that are supported by the same organizations that accept scientific consensus that CWF is safe and effective?&lt;/FONT&gt; If their members are not able to correctly evaluate the evidence (published and their personal experiences) regarding fluoridation, how can they be trusted to formulate any legitimate conclusions about any aspect of health care?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q1B) &lt;U&gt;If your response is YES, then answer the following questions:&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Is there a difference is between the scientific consensus on CWF and the scientific consensus of relevant experts that supports vaccines, drinking water disinfection, and other public health measures –&amp;nbsp;or any health initiative, for that matter?&amp;nbsp; If so, how does it differ?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Explain why you accept any health conclusions supported by the mainstream stream CWF-supporting organizations if they have been so inept, ignorant and willfully blind as to support fluoridation (and vaccination, according to other comments). For any evidence-based health care recommendation or procedure, there will be conflicting evidence. &lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;But how can the relevant professionals come to any reliable, trustworthy conclusions on anything if they have interpreted the body of evidence on fluoridation completely wrong&lt;/FONT&gt; by concluding CWF is safe and effective when the body of evidence (according to FOs) proves it is ineffective and significantly harmful.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Explain why anti-F activists spend immense amounts of time and resources trying to scare the public into accepting their minority position.&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt; Instead, why don’t FOs use those resources to try and convince the scientific community their interpretations of the evidence is legitimate?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt; If legitimate, reproducible evidence is presented, the consensus will change – that is how science evolves.&amp;nbsp; So far, that has not happened.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Explain why anti-F activists don’t use their resources to conduct high quality, unbiased research which will provide the evidence necessary to change the current consensus of experts.&lt;/FONT&gt; Even though I am not a dental or medical expert, I am a scientist familiar with conducting and interpreting research, and I can understand the reasons the studies presented by FOs so far have not been sufficient to change the CWF consensus.&lt;BR /&gt;To quote Dr. Haynie, MD (06-27-2018 06:30 PM) ”&lt;EM&gt;If [anti-science activists] wish to change positions on fluoridation, Dr. Limeback and others have an obligation to make their case before legitimate scientific forums and not simply bring arguments to lay audiences that have been rejected by experts&lt;/EM&gt;.”&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;JoeM&lt;STRONG&gt; (&lt;/STRONG&gt;‎07-12-2018 04:30 PM) provided an excellent description of the scientific consensus, “&lt;EM&gt;What was obvious is that there are an enormous number of relevant studies out there - I think the York Review identified over 3000 as far back as 2000. In such a situation we have to rely on a synthesis of all the evidence by competent experts rather than selecting bits and pieces of individual studies. This has been carried out now on many occasions in many countries. Thus, I accept this consensus&lt;/EM&gt;.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q2A) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Do you accept Dr. Osmunson’s &lt;/FONT&gt;07-09-2018 09:09 PM&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt; claim about the CDC, ADA and AAP,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;All the so called "scientific" organizations were all pupets of each other with fluoridation&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;?&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q2B) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;How about the rest of the 100+ organizations that recognize the benefits of CWF – do you believe they are all,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;so called ‘scientific’ organizations [that] do not protect the public.&amp;nbsp; They are lemmings, followers, part of a herd, not scientists&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;“&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt; as well?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q3A) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;On an important, related subject, (03-14-2017 06:49 PM ) you claim &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;EM&gt;Medical Mandates, whether finagled with financial incentives to fluoridate a community or legislated with punitive actions against any parent who chooses not to follow a vaccination schedule are dangerous to our health and our freedom&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;.”&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Since you have gone out of your way to bring vaccination into the fluoridation conversation, do you also believe vaccination policies (to use your 08-24-2018 10:07 AM language) are also &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;an &lt;STRONG&gt;immoral medical mandate&lt;/STRONG&gt; that forces &lt;STRONG&gt;contaminated product&lt;/STRONG&gt; into bodies of convenient consumers regardless of impact on individuals in &lt;STRONG&gt;vulnerable populations who include senior citizens&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;”&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q3B) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Do you believe the overall benefits to citizens of vaccines for flu, polio, MMR, DTP, chicken pox, shingles (for elders), etc. outweigh&amp;nbsp;the risks, or &lt;U&gt;are you planning to Demand that AARP Take Action and Ban Vaccinations&lt;/U&gt;?&amp;nbsp; If&amp;nbsp;everyone accepted the fear-mongering propaganda of the anti-vaccination activists (remarkably similar to the anti-F propaganda, search on -- Mercola vaccines -- for example) and chose to avoid vaccinations, what do you believe the consequences would be – a more healthy population?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q4A) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;You have not addressed my 08-21-2018 01:00 PM correction to your blatant misrepresentation of the precautionary principle;&lt;/FONT&gt; “&lt;EM&gt;Your frogs in a pot cartoon misrepresents the precautionary principle which is legitimately used in situations where the risks and benefits are not yet clearly understood.&amp;nbsp; In the case of community water fluoridation, the burden of proof that the public health measure is safe and effective has been met for 70&amp;nbsp; years&lt;/EM&gt;.”&amp;nbsp; &lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;A legitimate cartoon representing the precautionary principle would not show the two frogs already in an obviously dangerous pot of uncontrollably heating water ---&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366ff"&gt;&lt;U&gt;that is stupidity, not science, and it is precisely how FOs portray mainstream science and scientists&lt;/U&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/STRONG&gt;I have not yet had time to draw one, but an accurate cartoon would&amp;nbsp;depict the frogs in lab coats [a requirement for science cartoons] who are considering a tub of water they just encountered and measured to be at a comfortable temperature (for a frog).&amp;nbsp; At that point, they would not know what chemicals might be in the water, what was controlling the temperature, whether the temperature would rise, fall or stay the same, etc.&amp;nbsp; The cartoon would show them discussing various parameters to measure and processes to resolve the unknowns before determining the benefits vs. the risks.&amp;nbsp; That is an unknown situation where the precautionary principle is legitimately employed.&amp;nbsp; After thorough testing by the frogs and by a number of other frog scientists that reliably determined the water was chemically safe, the temperature remained constant, there were health benefits to soaking in the warm water and no negative health issues were observed, &amp;nbsp;a consensus was established that the benefits to soaking in the tub (as studied) outweighed any risks.&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q4B) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;You also did not provide an answer to my question,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; “&lt;/STRONG&gt;If your&lt;EM&gt; claim &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;‘&lt;/STRONG&gt;The evidence of harm caused by fluoridation is substantial and definitive&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;’&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;EM&gt; is even remotely valid, how can you possibly explain the fact, which has been brought up and ignored by FOs &amp;nbsp;numerous times, that all of the major science and health organizations continue to publically recognize the scientific consensus that community water fluoridation is safe and effective and that there are no such organizations that support the anti-F agenda.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;” &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;--- except, of course, by claiming all professionals who don’t publically oppose fluoridation are,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;greedy, ignorant, willfully blind, morally corrupt&lt;/EM&gt;, &lt;EM&gt;cowards &amp;amp;/or sociopaths&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;”,&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;as claimed in your comments below, which appear to illustrate your disdain for mainstream scientists, health professionals and their professional organizations.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Before I comment further, I would like to make certain I understand exactly what you mean by your claims from several comments:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On (&lt;SPAN&gt;08-22-2018&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;06:59 AM&lt;/SPAN&gt;) you claim, “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Willful blindness&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;EM&gt; and &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;financial benefit&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;[greed]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;EM&gt; affect &lt;STRONG&gt;both organizations&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;[ADA and EPA]&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;EM&gt;and individuals and are eminently rational rationales for refusal to change, although also &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;morally corrupt&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;and&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;”&lt;EM&gt;vested interests are doing their part to protect a profitable program that causes misery to millions&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;and&lt;/STRONG&gt; ”&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Agnotology: Culturally &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;induced ignorance&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/U&gt;or &lt;STRONG&gt;willful blindness&lt;/STRONG&gt;, particularly the promotion of misleading scientific data and anecdotes by a biased group&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You also claim (08-19-2018 01:05 PM) that,&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt; “&lt;EM&gt;Most [dentists] are either &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ignorant&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;or &lt;U&gt;willfully blind&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Others are either &lt;STRONG&gt;cowed into silence&lt;/STRONG&gt; per my previous comments or are indeed &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;sociopaths&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; motivated by power, prestige and paychecks&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You also claim (07-25-2018 11:30 PM) that. &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;“&lt;EM&gt;the &lt;STRONG&gt;malignant medical myth&lt;/STRONG&gt; of fluoridation persists because not only is there a profitable business model built on fluoridation, fluoridation promotion is profitable to many advocates&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You also claim 07-03-2018 07:35 AM), &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&amp;nbsp;“&lt;EM&gt;I have it on good authority that they &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;[American Thyroid Association]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;EM&gt; don't want to provoke a political storm with other groups &lt;STRONG&gt;- &lt;U&gt;cowards&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q5) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;Are these comments an accurate representation of your opinion of the ADA, EPA and ATA and any members who do not publically support the anti-F demands?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q6)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt; Do you also extend your accusations of ADA and EPA&amp;nbsp;and ATA members as &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;greedy, ignorant, willfully blind, morally corrupt&lt;/EM&gt;, &lt;EM&gt;cowards &amp;amp;/or sociopaths"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt; to the hundreds of thousands of professionals who are members of all the other science and health care organizations that continue to recognize the benefits of CWF and have not publically denounced CWF? &amp;nbsp;Or do you have another explanation for why those professional health care providers choose to remain silent &lt;STRONG&gt;–&lt;/STRONG&gt; or publically support the practice?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; As noted, according to your opinion (08-21-2018 06:38 AM), &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;"&lt;EM&gt;The evidence of harm caused by fluoridation is substantial and definitive"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; and so millions of patients worldwide who drink optimally fluoridated water obviously must be suffering the misery of Cancer, Lowered IQ, Diabetes, Hypothyroidism, GI Effects, Arthritis, Hypersensitivity, Kidney Disease, ADHD, Brittle Bones, etc. –– yet&amp;nbsp;they do not speak out.&amp;nbsp; &lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;If you are correct, we are all in serious trouble&amp;nbsp;as these greedy, ignorant, willfully blind, morally corrupt, cowardly &amp;amp;/or sociopathic health professionals continue to practice&lt;I&gt;.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;I believe the only rational explanation to explain the fact that the major science and health organizations continue to publically recognize the benefits of CWF is that&amp;nbsp;a significant majority of their members have actually&amp;nbsp;evaluated the risks and benefits of CWF, have seen the positive consequences of fluoridation (and negligible evidence of the alleged negative consequences) in their practices and accepted the legitimacy of the scientific consensus that the benefits of CWF are far greater than any alleged risks.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2018 21:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RandyJ913440</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-26T21:48:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1528688#M182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“The evidence that fluoride is more harmful than beneficial is now overwhelming… fluoride may be destroying our bones, our teeth, and our overall health.” &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;- &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;Dr. Hardy Limeback, &amp;nbsp;former President of Canadian ADA, Head of Preventive Dentistry at Univ of Toronto, 2006 National Research Council Scientist (2007)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 2006 National Research Council on Fluoride in Drinking Water commented to the EPA that fluoridation at 1 ppm can be anticipated to be harmful for those with reduced renal function and the elderly. The NRC confirmed that fluoride&amp;nbsp;not excreted by kidneys builds up in bones, resulting in arthritic pain and increased brittleness.&amp;nbsp;However, there were no EPA studies on the whole health impacts of fluoridated water on susceptible population such as kidney patients, children, those with prolonged disease or the elderly. There still aren’t.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, there is mounting science from other sources that “optimally fluoridated” water, which is known to cause varying degrees of dental fluorosis in 58% of Black American adolescents and 36% of White American adolescents, is causing subtle deficits in ability to remember or focus. That same “optimal level” has also been proved in a 2014 study as being nephrotoxic in rats with chronic kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 15% of Americans, although CKD is quadruple the rate in Black Americans, and predictably worse in older Americans.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the most horrifying part of the story of fluoridation is that not only is at least 50% of every drop of fluoride that has passed the lips of a Baby Boomer permanently stored in bones, fluoride&amp;nbsp;isn't the only poison in packages of fluoride that originate as&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;waste product of aluminum an phosphate industry. 100% of the fluoride sampled in a 2014 study was contaminated with aluminum; arsenic and lead were other common contaminants. In other words, fluoridated water serves as a delivery system for aluminum and lead into our bones and our brains. As we all know, aluminum is associated with Alzheimers in adults, and lead is associated with learning disabilities in children. Approximately 15% of the population who is sensitive to chemicals cite inability to think clearly and overwhelming fatigue as symptoms of exposure to fluoridated water.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our generation was part of a great human experiment. It may have had noble intentions based on the faulty hypothesis that &amp;nbsp;drinking fluoridated water prevented cavities. It is now known that any perceived benefits of fluoride are from tooth brushing. &amp;nbsp;Our grandchildren are the third generation in this travesty. I suggest we all DEMAND the AARP stand up for us and our grandchildren by issuing a strong position paper calling for the cessation of water fluoridation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;SCIENCE REFERENCES&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2014 in Toxicology. Effect of water fluoridation on the development of medial vascular calcification in uremic rats. (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Optimal levels” worsen kidney function&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561004" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561004&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2015&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;in Neurotoxicology and Teratology. Association of lifetime exposure to fluoride and cognitive functions in Chinese children: A pilot study.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(&lt;EM&gt;Children with visible dental fluorosis perform&amp;nbsp;less well on memory tasks, correlating with the degree of severity of their fluorosis. One of a series of human and animal studies with the same consistent findings.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446012" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446012&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://braindrain.dk/2014/12/mottled-fluoride-debate/" target="_blank"&gt;http://braindrain.dk/2014/12/mottled-fluoride-debate/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in Physiology and Behavior. Fluoride exposure during development affects both cognition and emotion in mice. (&lt;EM&gt;Measurable behavioral changes&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184405" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184405&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. A new perspective on metals and other contaminants in fluoridation chemicals. (&lt;EM&gt;All samples of fluoride are&amp;nbsp;contaminated with aluminum, plus other contaminants like arsenic, lead and barium&lt;/EM&gt;);&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999851" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999851&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/Mullenix%202014-2-2.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/Mullenix%202014-2-2.pdf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in Scientific World Journal. Water Fluoridation: A Critical Review of the Physiological Effects of Ingested Fluoride as a Public Health Intervention. (&lt;EM&gt;Health risks and cost don't justify minimal&amp;nbsp;and questionable dental benefit&lt;/EM&gt;.): &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;RACIAL INEQUITY (FOIA)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are three Oct 2014 news articles on the content of the Freedom of Information Act documents. Rev. Andrew Young, former UN ambassador has pursued them with the CDC, but to little effect. Civil Rights leaders have been calling for an end to community water fluoridation (CWF) since 2011.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Black Americans disproportionately harmed:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. CDC, ADA and Pew inappropriate relationships:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://benswann.com/do-newly-released-emails-reveal-conflict-of-interest-between-the-cdc-and-the-ada/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://benswann.com/do-newly-released-emails-reveal-conflict-of-interest-between-the-cdc-and-the-ada/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. Kidneys, Civil Rights &amp;amp; Ralph Nader:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/10/428383.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/10/428383.shtml&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 LEGAL ARGUMENT (GROSS DISPROPORTIONALITY)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a legal initiative in Peel, Ontario (pop 1.3m) to remove fluoride from the water supply based on the principle of gross disproportionality, i.e. marginal benefit does not justify great risk of harm. There is also a political effort afoot in Canadian govt to mandate fluoridation and thereby make the legal argument moot. &lt;STRONG&gt;I suggest this document is well-worth printing. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/peel.june2014.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/peel.june2014.pdf&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a. The first 19 pages of this document is about the legal strategy. It includes summary of US legal cases that found water fluoridation harmful to the public, but legal under US "police power" mandate.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;b. Starting on page 20 is a devastating affidavit by Dr. Kathleen Thiessen, NAS/NRC scientist and international expert in risk assessment. Very readable summary of science indicating harm to populations in “optimally” fluoridated communities.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;POPULATION WITH LOW CHEMICAL THRESHOLD&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In excess of 25% of previously healthy Gulf War Veterans have Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, which includes sensitivity to fluoride. See:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/committee_documents/gwiandhealthofgwveterans_rac-gwvireport_2008.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/committee_documents/gwiandhealthofgwveterans_rac-gwvireport_2008.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;EXCERPT&lt;/STRONG&gt;: “It is&amp;nbsp;well established that&amp;nbsp;some people are more vulnerable&amp;nbsp;to adverse effects of certain&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;chemicals than others,&amp;nbsp;due to variability in biological processes that neutralize those chemicals, and clear them from&amp;nbsp;the body.”&amp;nbsp;-&amp;nbsp;Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses 2008&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Affidavit of Dr. Hans Moolenburgh:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/affidavit-moolenburgh.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/affidavit-moolenburgh.pdf&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Except&lt;/STRONG&gt;: “As a summary of our research, we are now convinced that fluoridation of the water supplies causes a low grade intoxication of the whole population, with only the approximately&amp;nbsp;5% most sensitive persons showing acute symptoms.The whole population being subjected to low grade poisoning means that their immune systems are constantly&amp;nbsp;overtaxed. With all the other poisonous influences in our environment, this can hasten health calamities.”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PubMed Listed Studies on immune system response:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;a. Fluoride makes allergies worse, rats (1990): &lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707853" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707853&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;b. Fluoride makes allergies worse, in vitro&amp;nbsp;(1999): &lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892783?dopt=Abstract" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892783&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;c. Immune system of the gut (2010):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2010/823710/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2010/823710/&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;d.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ASIA Syndrome, adjuvant impact (2011): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;e.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Gene predicts fluoride sensitivity (2015):&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25556215" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25556215&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;f. &amp;nbsp;Brain has an immune system (2015):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030524" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030524&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AARP - STAND UP on our behalf!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2018 22:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1528688#M182</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-26T22:38:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530258#M184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is an excellent issue for AARP to spearhead. This practice of adding toxic chemicals to raise the fluoride level to prevent tooth decay is NOT safe and is Not even effective!! And for seniors it jut adds more burden on our bodies especially our brains!! Fluoridation has become a political issue when&amp;nbsp; organizations like AARP need to look past the years of propaganda and endorsements and expose the harm out weieghs the supposed benefits! THANK you for opening up this topic ...AARP please take this on!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530258#M184</guid>
      <dc:creator>ri1666</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:20:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530285#M185</link>
      <description>Yes!! FLUORIDE - I am 61 and my wife is 65. This is an extremely important topic! I am retired with a degree in Environmental Sciences including Biological Chemistry with added studies in Nutrition.&lt;BR /&gt;Seniors are more at risk for all kinds of health complications, because as we ingest Fluoride in the water, foods, and from other sources, it accumulates.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The CDC states that half of the Fluoride we ingest, accumulates in the body!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since (FLUORIDE) F- is the MOST REACTIVE ION of any other element, it can EASILY REACT with many of the body’s minerals and chemicals.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See what the CDC says...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - BONES and JOINTS&lt;BR /&gt;“…exposure to higher levels of fluoride may harm your health. Skeletal fluorosis can be caused by eating, drinking or breathing very large amounts of fluorides. This disease only occurs after long term exposures (because Fluoride accumulates with the ongoing daily bone formations of every age group) and can cause denser bones,&lt;BR /&gt;joint pain,&lt;BR /&gt;and a limited range of joint movement.&lt;BR /&gt;…severe cases, the spine completely rigid…”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC&lt;BR /&gt;“…fluoride can result in denser bones…&lt;BR /&gt;...these bones are often&lt;BR /&gt;more brittle&lt;BR /&gt;or fragile&lt;BR /&gt;than normal bone&lt;BR /&gt;and there is an increased risk of older men and women breaking a bone.&lt;BR /&gt;Some studies have also found a higher risk of bone fractures in older men and women at fluoride levels typically found in fluoridated water….”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC&lt;BR /&gt;40% of children suffer “dental fluorosis"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - TOPICAL ONLY is effective&lt;BR /&gt;The CDC (Center for Disease Control) states that: “(Fluoride’s) actions primarily are topical for both adults and children”.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - teeth breaking&lt;BR /&gt;“…in severe cases, the teeth are pitted and are fragile, and sometimes the teeth can break.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC – The CDC’s ATSDR warns about consuming large amounts of fluoride in that “…it can cause stomach aches, vomiting, and diarrhea. Extremely large amounts can cause death by affecting your heart.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I WANT MORE ARTICLES AND SUPPORT from AARP about exposing Fluoride's adverse health affects to the elderly (and young children or infants).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530285#M185</guid>
      <dc:creator>tt59717964</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530832#M187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Extremely important topic from my community and for those of us over 50 as well. &amp;nbsp;If you've ever gone to an orthopedic sturgeon and been told, you have arthritis, bone spurs, thickening and brittleness of the bones, osteosclerosis, then you most likely have damage from too much fluoride. It's called skeletal fluorosis in just about every other county. &amp;nbsp;It is a chronic crippling problem that by that point you are aware of it there isn't much you can do about it but suffer and bear the expense. &amp;nbsp;The mayo clinic did one study associating it with too much black tea, but they've pretty much been told to back off fluoride if they want to advance their careers. &amp;nbsp; the original studies in 1946 by the ADA also clearly demonstrated this problem in the lab rats.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530832#M187</guid>
      <dc:creator>pablomck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-07T19:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531351#M188</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:07:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531351#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>lp47633557</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-08T20:07:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531792#M189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If AARP has ever taken on a cuase that could have a great impact on the health of our community .... THIS IS IT!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:23:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531792#M189</guid>
      <dc:creator>rb98221521</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-09T18:23:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THYROID: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539756#M190</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“The addition of fluorides to drinking water was, and is, a mistake.” &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;- Dr. Robert Isaacson, 2006 National Research Council Scientist (2007)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ON THYROID&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you see this week's Newsweek article on a nationwide English study?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;People living in fluoridated communities have significantly higher incidences of low thyroid. Over&amp;nbsp;50% more incidence in "optimally" fluoridated communities than in communities with &amp;lt;.3 ppm. &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-may-increase-risk-underactive-thyroid-disorder-309173"&gt;http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-may-increase-risk-underactive-thyroid-disorder-309173&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's not surprising. There are studies from the early 20th century connecting various thyroid and parathyroid conditions with fluorides in the water and mottled teeth. The 2006 NRC also confirmed that fluoride even at low concentrations disrupts endocrine function, i.e. thyroid hormones. Sadly, gung-ho dentists urged on by business who stood to profit convinced government that&amp;nbsp;fluoride was some sort of magic bullet. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is wrecking our health and the health of our grandkids!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phone and write AARP... tell them to take a stand against water fluoridation, now!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539756#M190</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-08T19:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADHD: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539770#M191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;"The evidence against the safety of this public health policy will keep mounting and never disappear again. My ignorance of fluoride in the beginning was a matter of chance. If you ignore this evidence today, it will be a matter of choice.”&lt;/STRONG&gt; - &lt;EM&gt;Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, Head Toxicologist at Forsyth Dental Center (1999)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ON&amp;nbsp;HYPERACTIVITY&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See TODAY's study published in Environmental Health that correlates ADHD (hyperactivity) in children with fluoridation. This is only the latest in 20 years of studies on animals and humans proving that fluoride in utero or youth not only permanently mottles the teeth of some children, but also permanently scrambles their brains:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2015 Ecologic study:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/14/1/17/abstract"&gt;http://www.ehjournal.net/content/14/1/17/abstract&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1995 Animal study: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/mullenix-1995.pdf"&gt;http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/mullenix-1995.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend&amp;nbsp;this 1996 talk by Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, the author of the 1995 study:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hci7BnWydAo"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hci7BnWydAo&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is wrecking our health and the health of our grandkids!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phone and write AARP... tell them to take a stand against water fluoridation, now!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539770#M191</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-27T19:04:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554257#M214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sometimes, by the time you get to 50 or 60, people seem to think it is time to be in poor health, need a joint replacement, have thyroid dysfunction and diabetes. &amp;nbsp;With all the evidence of Fluoride being an endocrine dysrupter and known to Fluoride deposits in our bones, I imagine if AARP would take a long hard look at this topic, you would have numerous supporters from all walks of life. &amp;nbsp;The young people of the nation are beginning to see the illogical addition of Fluoride to our water supply and are shaking&amp;nbsp;their heads at us older adults wondering why we let this continue for so long.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 01:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554257#M214</guid>
      <dc:creator>kf4601639</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T01:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554966#M215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Adding additional contaminants to water is not required by law and should be&amp;nbsp;seen as a hindrance in the goal to provide the cleanest most natural water to customers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554966#M215</guid>
      <dc:creator>kf4601639</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T18:30:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1573728#M229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your intelligent and educational posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you look on the Periodic Table of Elements, you will see&amp;nbsp;Fluorine, Chlorine and Bromine (a common baking additive) all displace Iodine ~ which is vital to healthy&amp;nbsp;thyroid function. No wonder thyroid malfunction has become&amp;nbsp;rampant! We once added iodine to our table salt to insure adequate levels. Now,&amp;nbsp;that effort has been&amp;nbsp;sabotaged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And honestly, if fluoride worked in preventing cavities, wouldn't America be cavity-free by now?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2015 03:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1573728#M229</guid>
      <dc:creator>dd67136683</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-17T03:00:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1574706#M230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;From:&lt;EM&gt; &lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/erin-brockovich-and-signers-put-health-agencies-notice-april-2015" target="_self"&gt;Moms Against Fluoridation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="row"&gt;&lt;DIV class="sixteen columns"&gt;&lt;DIV class="page_heading"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Erin Brockovich and signers put the Health agencies on notice: April, 2015&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="row"&gt;&lt;DIV class="sixteen columns "&gt;&lt;DIV class="region region-content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="block block-system"&gt;&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="node node-news-headline node-promoted node-news-headline node-promoted clearfix"&gt;&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field-items"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field-item even"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erin Brockovich has just put the government on big notice of their shortcomings in interpreting science and protecting the&amp;nbsp;health of American citizens.&amp;nbsp; Please take time to read this document about fluoridation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;This is one of the very the best documents/ letters we have seen.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The references are great; the critical thinking is excellent, and the range and depth she covers are compelling. &amp;nbsp;&lt;U&gt;And, it has some 'teeth&lt;/U&gt;'.&amp;nbsp; Just read the first 2 pages if you are short on time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/pdf-documents/Brockovich-Letter-to-US-Natl-Acad-Science-Inst-Medicine.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Read Letter&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I suggest the Signature page (p 16) and the Questions attachment&amp;nbsp;(last page) provide the best summary of this 24 page document, but go ahead, read the whole thing. It's worth your time! &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 22:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1574706#M230</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-19T22:26:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1580164#M235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“&lt;STRONG&gt;Industry has learned that debating the science is much easier and more effective than debating the policy. In field after field, year after year, conclusions that might support regulation are always disputed. Animal data are deemed not relevant, human data not representative, and exposure data not reliable.&lt;/STRONG&gt;” &lt;EM&gt;- David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, in “Doubt Is Their Product” (2008)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Prof. Rita Barnett-Rose of Chapman University includes a nice mix of science and law in her 2014 legal analysis of the U.S. fluoridation policy. She concludes, "&lt;EM&gt;The evidence continues to suggest that compulsory water fluoridation is no longer justifiable as a public health benefit.... &lt;STRONG&gt;the cessatio&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;n of all compulsory water fluoridation schemes should be the goal of all public health agencies, ethical lawmakers, and informed citizens.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See: &lt;A href="http://works.bepress.com/rita_barnett/3/" target="_blank"&gt;http://works.bepress.com/rita_barnett/3/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phone, email or write the AARP directly. Tell them they need to step up and write a position statement opposing fluoridation, for the sake of the elderly, those in&amp;nbsp;fragile health, pregnant women and their fetuses, and the very young.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:27:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1580164#M235</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-01T15:27:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1588061#M236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"When a statistical analysis of 1,000 children was conducted in London, and results were not as fluoridation proponents wanted, the study was quickly abandoned.&lt;/STRONG&gt;" &lt;EM&gt;- Dr. Malcolm Naylor, 1987 winner of Tomes Medal for imminence in dental research&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;Cochrane is the international gold standard panel for public health review. They found &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;bias rather than benefit&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; in their review of the dental studies. Moreover, like every large independent review of the dental science, the Cochrane panel finds that the evidence of dental benefit is poor quality, highly suspect, and does &lt;EM&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; support the rationale that fluoridation&amp;nbsp;benefits the poor. In the meantime, the scientific and legal arguments&amp;nbsp;against fluoridation as harmful to health mount.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Cochrane review of dental studies&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cochrane.org/CD010856/ORAL_water-fluoridation-to-prevent-tooth-decay" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD010856/ORAL_water-fluoridation-to-prevent-tooth-decay&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Newsweek article on Cochrane review&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.newsweek.com/fluoridation-may-not-prevent-cavities-huge-study-shows-348251" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.newsweek.com/fluoridation-may-not-prevent-cavities-huge-study-shows-348251&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Opposition&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.earthclinic.com/news/why-the-us-should-ban-fluoride-in-drinking-water-by-jason-uttley.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.earthclinic.com/news/why-the-us-should-ban-fluoride-in-drinking-water-by-jason-uttley.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Write the AARP and your local newspaper!&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;Tell them that Cochrane confirms the dentists are lying and that you side with consumer adovcate Erin Brockovich, Civil Rights leaders, and &lt;SPAN&gt;21st century researchers like the&amp;nbsp;Harvard team of neuroscientists&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;in opposing fluoridation as a Human Rights violation!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1588061#M236</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T18:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596602#M238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;I&gt;"&lt;/I&gt;Fluoride is an enzyme poison, in the same class as cyanide, oxalate, or azide ... it is capable of a very wide variety of harmful effects, even at low doses. It is a scientific disgrace that a well organized lobby of the American Dental Association ever managed to stampede American legislators into ignoring the highly technical but very cogent objection to fluoridation."&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;I&gt;- James B. Patrick, Ph.D., antibiotics research scientist at National Institute of Health&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Latest study on fluoride concerns its capacity to cause &lt;STRONG&gt;INFLAMMATIONS&lt;/STRONG&gt; even at very small exposure level, such as that from water fluoridation. I especially like this key finding, "&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Long-term exposure to fluoride may affect activities of many enzymes&lt;/EM&gt;."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we really want a drug that interferes with the normal functioning of our enzymes, as well as causing or worsening inflammations to be an ubiquitous contaminant in our water and food? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2015 in Toxicology in Vitro. Fluoride as a factor initiating and potentiating inflammation in THP1 differentiated monocytes/macrophages&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001605" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001605&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Baby Boomers - this is your life and the lives of your children, grandchildren, and g-grandchildren at risk. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DO SOMETHING&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Contact the AARP, your politicians, the White House.... &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;tell them to get the F* out of our water&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;.... Municipalities can use the financial savings to replace ineffective and dangerous chloramine which also kills enzymes and causes disease with a more effective and safe disinfectant alternative. And you can use the better quality of life and lower doctors bills to enjoy life.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596602#M238</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:44:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596607#M239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For those who like visuals, this 1955 film shows what happens to &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;enzymes&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; in human blood with fluoride concentrations consistent with drinking a glass of "optimally" fluoridated water.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32op3srFDk8" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32op3srFDk8&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This enzyme death in the blood explains why some of us experience&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Chizzola maculae&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;, a distinctive bruise like hive that affects a minority of women and children in the early stages of fluoride poisoning. It's an abnormal blood coagulation and the destruction of blood vessels, an autoimmune reaction.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="page"&gt;&lt;DIV class="section"&gt;&lt;DIV class="layoutArea"&gt;&lt;DIV class="column"&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1978 Major Fluoride Symptoms:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/flier_waldbott_symptoms_ftgd.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/flier_waldbott_symptoms_ftgd.pdf&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1977 Blood Clotting in Patients with Chizzola Maculae. Fluoride. vol.10:1. p 29-33. http://&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fluorideresearch.org/101/files/FJ1977_v10_n1_p001-044.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;www.fluorideresearch.org/101/files/FJ1977_v10_n1_p001-044.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:45:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596607#M239</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:45:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596637#M240</link>
      <description>First, eating and drinking fluoride ion has no effect whatsoever on dental caries, as published in detailed studies by Zigelbecker, and also by Sutton, and by Teotia and Teotia, and also by Yamouyiannis. The fluoride concentration in saliva that bathes teeth topically (at 0.016 ppm, NRC, 2006) is 75,000 times less than that in toothpaste. Second, systemic fluoride dissolves in the blood and throughout all tissues at 0.2 ppm from regular consumption of treated drinking water. The ion accumulates lifelong permanently into bone causing the formation of new bone of poor quality. We now have 1/3 million U.S. elderly who suffer from broken hips which usually is lethal due to pneumonia that ensues while waiting for fluoridated bone to heal. Cruel experiments in dogs indicate that broken bones heal far more slowly when animals are given fluoridated water. Finally, adding fluoride into drinking water is illegal. No EPA regulated water contaminant, including fluoride, can be discharged into public drinking water intentionally without an NPDES permit from the EPA, as stipulated by the Clean Water Act. And the Safe Drinking Water Act prohibits the requirement of any substance added into water other than to sanitize the water. The EPA Office of Water argues that, as a substance that is being used to treat humans, the FDA is responsible for regulating fluoridation. The FDA argues that, as a pollutant being added intentionally into water, the EPA is in charge of its regulation. The HHS recommended that fluoride levels not exceed 0l7 ppm but refuses to accept liability for its use, in particular to avoid litigation over the easily proven increase in unwanted unsightly abnormal dental enamel hypoplasia dental fluorosis that plagues 42% of U.S. teens as a result of water "fluoridation." Please get involved and halt this absurd experiment from being continued.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596637#M240</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs5526</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T16:48:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596648#M241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great idea!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm starting a coalition in NYC Against Artificial Fluoridation - Fluoride in not a nutrient, we shoudn't be exposing ourselves to neurotoxins by drinking the toxic waste product of the fertilizer industry. Please email nyc.caaf@gmail.com for more information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596648#M241</guid>
      <dc:creator>sn4302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596650#M242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a really great article: please help get this neurotoxin out of our water, and our food.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am starting a coalition against artificial fluoridation in NYC - please email nyc.caaf@gmail.com if you are interested in helping getting the word out - this stuff is toxic, not a nutrient, not safe and we shouldn't be drinking it!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:26:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596650#M242</guid>
      <dc:creator>sn4302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:26:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1598286#M245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dr. Richard Sauerheber who added a post in this thread is a chemist, college professor and researcher who has published some excellent work on the toxicity of industrial fluoride in drinking water. As a result of his research, he has written letters opposing fluoridation to the FDA and other regulatory agencies, urging they take action, i.e. actually consider science to regulate the industries in order protect the health of the public:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2013 Publication:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690253/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690253/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2010-2011 Letters: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/ask-dr-sauerheber" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/ask-dr-sauerheber&lt;/A&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, doctor!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;“When industry and government agree, people suffer.”&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;EM&gt;- Proverb&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 13:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1598286#M245</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-18T13:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

