<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multi-employer Pension Plan Defautls in About Our Community</title>
    <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/About-Our-Community/Multi-employer-Pension-Plan-Defautls/m-p/2166896#M4233</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;AARP does taxpayers a disservice when recommending that the government subsidize multi-employer pension plans that have defaulted. &amp;nbsp;Why not go after the companies who participated in the plans? &amp;nbsp;Supporting the "Rehabilitation for Multiemployer Pension Act" in the July/August AARP Bulletin is wrong. &amp;nbsp;This bill provides low-cost 30-year loans to defaulted plans at taxpayer expense. &amp;nbsp;While I feel sorry for people affected by these plans that were obviously poorly run, why should taxpayers bail them out? &amp;nbsp;Go back to the companies that funded these plans and have them provide loans and subsidies. &amp;nbsp;It's not the taxpayer's fault that these pension monies were invested badly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoanneD174592</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-22T13:47:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multi-employer Pension Plan Defautls</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/About-Our-Community/Multi-employer-Pension-Plan-Defautls/m-p/2166896#M4233</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;AARP does taxpayers a disservice when recommending that the government subsidize multi-employer pension plans that have defaulted. &amp;nbsp;Why not go after the companies who participated in the plans? &amp;nbsp;Supporting the "Rehabilitation for Multiemployer Pension Act" in the July/August AARP Bulletin is wrong. &amp;nbsp;This bill provides low-cost 30-year loans to defaulted plans at taxpayer expense. &amp;nbsp;While I feel sorry for people affected by these plans that were obviously poorly run, why should taxpayers bail them out? &amp;nbsp;Go back to the companies that funded these plans and have them provide loans and subsidies. &amp;nbsp;It's not the taxpayer's fault that these pension monies were invested badly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/About-Our-Community/Multi-employer-Pension-Plan-Defautls/m-p/2166896#M4233</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoanneD174592</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-22T13:47:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-employer Pension Plan Defautls</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/About-Our-Community/Multi-employer-Pension-Plan-Defautls/m-p/2167363#M4234</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As a taxpayer, I’m certainly concerned about how my tax money is spent. However, taxpayers will absorb the costs with or without the proposed low interest loans to shore up multiemployer pension assets.&amp;nbsp; According to a report from the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS), “Pensiononics 2018: Measuring the Impact of Multiemployer DB Pension Expenditures,” for every dollar in multiemployer pension benefits paid out in 2016, $2.13 in total economic output was supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In 2016, multiemployer pension plans paid $41.8 billion in benefits.&amp;nbsp; The average pension benefit was $11,935 a year, but collectively it created $89 billion in total economic output and $50 billion in value added to the gross domestic product (GDP).&amp;nbsp; It also generated $14.7 billion in federal, state and local tax revenue and supported 543,000 American jobs that paid $28 billion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, Pension withdrawal liability will place the multiemployer system at risk.&amp;nbsp; The multiemployer system is critical to the U.S. economy.&amp;nbsp; In 2015, the multiemployer system paid $158 billion in federal taxes, $82 billion in state and local taxes, contributed more than $1 trillion to the U.S. GDP, and supported 13.6 million American jobs.&amp;nbsp; This includes $203 billion in wages and $41 billion in pensions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The government’s minimum exposure for doing nothing to financially stabilize multiemployer pensions is estimated to be more than $170 billion in 10-years, and $330 billion in 30-years, creating an economic ripple.&amp;nbsp; The government’s investment in low interest loans to shore up multiemployer pension assets may be the least costly option for taxpayers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with AARP's position. The proposed government loan program (Butch Lewis Act - H.R. 397) is financially prudent and helps all Americans.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:45:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/About-Our-Community/Multi-employer-Pension-Plan-Defautls/m-p/2167363#M4234</guid>
      <dc:creator>NormanL19001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-24T00:45:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

