How Does Your Brain Score? Take the Staying Sharp Brain Health Assessment

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
Posts: 23,505
Registered: ‎02-21-2014

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 1 of 78 (16 Views)

MIseker wrote:

creppelrm wrote:

The bottom line is it takes two to tango.  Even if one knows he has all the tools to come out on top.


Yes, and it would seem all the alt right supporters here have no comment on the Nazi rounding the corner from behind her to deliver the punch without warning. Thats ok with then because she was there. People like this embolden the antifa.


Let's be honest here. We are not talking about two people walking down the street and one suddenly slugs the other. There was a group of people there to demonstrate their position and another group there to disrupt their demonstration. 

 

So, "rounding the corner" was inaccurate. "from behind her" was inaccurate. It was the middle of a slug-fest so "delivered a punch without warning" was inaccurate. Based on the inaccuracies there are two possibilities - intentional lying or just didn't see the videos, I like you so I'll assume you did not see the videos.

Respected Social Butterfly
Posts: 5,618
Registered: ‎11-18-2009

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 2 of 78 (24 Views)

creppelrm wrote:

The bottom line is it takes two to tango.  Even if one knows he has all the tools to come out on top.


Yes, and it would seem all the alt right supporters here have no comment on the Nazi rounding the corner from behind her to deliver the punch without warning. Thats ok with then because she was there. People like this embolden the antifa.

So it begins.
Valued Social Butterfly
Posts: 23,505
Registered: ‎02-21-2014

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 3 of 78 (31 Views)

MIseker wrote:


The subject really isn't who is scheduled to speak. it is about violent suppression of free speech. 


no it isnt. its about the school canceling them. I do believe your gal Coulter is now scheduled. 

 

Yes, cancelling them out of fear of the violent mobs.

 

Aside - "your gal" is a bit below you. It's like the "your hero", "your idol" silliness that some insist on posting.

 

What are your views about the violent mobs in the streets controlling the actions of the University administration? Does that contribute to your revolution or are you looking for a revolution in the ballot box??

 


 

Respected Social Butterfly
Posts: 5,618
Registered: ‎11-18-2009

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 4 of 78 (34 Views)

rk9152 wrote:

Richva wrote:

When the Berkeley students protested Milo Yiannopoulos, the Right Wing lamented the lack of free speech.  When Milo got banned from Tritter for his racist postings, there was complete silence from the RW  Then, when the CPAC conference banned him from speaking the RW felt this was all quite reasonable. 

 

Typical Conservative hypocrisy all over again. 


The subject really isn't who is scheduled to speak. it is about violent suppression of free speech. 


no it isnt. its about the school canceling them. I do believe your gal Coulter is now scheduled. 

 

So it begins.
Valued Social Butterfly
Posts: 1,233
Registered: ‎03-06-2012

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 5 of 78 (42 Views)

The bottom line is it takes two to tango.  Even if one knows he has all the tools to come out on top.

Valued Social Butterfly
Posts: 23,505
Registered: ‎02-21-2014

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 6 of 78 (58 Views)

Botton line, folks - your heroine went there with the specific intent of creating violence. You really have come a long way from the days of Rosa Parks as a person to be admired.

Valued Social Butterfly
Posts: 23,505
Registered: ‎02-21-2014

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 7 of 78 (59 Views)

creppelrm wrote:

So you would have punched her and kicked her after she was on the ground?  


Certainly not.

 

But, back to the topic - So you would go to an event with the specific intention of disruption and "getting scalps"?

 

If so it would appear that you would go into an event with the intention of creating violence. In doing so, do you not dismiss your right to later complain about violence?

Valued Social Butterfly
Posts: 23,505
Registered: ‎02-21-2014

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 8 of 78 (58 Views)

MIseker wrote:
love the antifa experts here. My Dad was an antifa in the early 40's.

And did your father go to disrupt rally's in support of our President with the intention of causing violence and "getting scalps". That is the group you are defending is the search for your revolution to overturn the election.

Valued Social Butterfly
Posts: 23,505
Registered: ‎02-21-2014

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 9 of 78 (58 Views)

pc6063 wrote:

Scout-Yup,  but do you think to the deniers the truth really matters?


Yup - http://sfist.com/2017/04/21/snopes_takes_on_punched_antifa_woma.php

Valued Social Butterfly
Posts: 23,505
Registered: ‎02-21-2014

Re: UC-Berkely Attacks FREE SPEECH (again)

Message 10 of 78 (60 Views)

Olderscout66 wrote:

Watched 4 video's, saw ZERO bottles in the hands of the woman who got punched. Appears the fascisti have decided to talk about something that doesn't exist until people believe it does...again.


http://sfist.com/2017/04/21/snopes_takes_on_punched_antifa_woma.php (Bottom of page)

 

And just who are these "fascisti talking about" you referenced? Surely not any of your fellow posters.