Watch Tonight for Tips to Save Money on Pricey Prescription Drugs at 10 p.m. ET on AARP LIVE! Watch Here

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

139 Views
Message 41 of 112

rker321 wrote:

RK  Miller again showed his inability and lack of ability to have the job that he has. Now, he seems to contradict President Trump in not accepting a comprehension Immigration Reform, What is he doing?  trying now to fill Bannon shoes?


If his boss is not happy with him, he can fire him. He isn't my concern.

Report Inappropriate Content
Treasured Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

158 Views
Message 42 of 112

rk9152 wrote:

phyllisc6781 wrote:

@Cirice—RWNJs  are putting out ridiculous claims and accusations to cover up for the ridiculous freak show put on by Miller- – Nothing less, nothing more.  

 

Anybody who has two eyes and to ears can plainly see and hear that Tapper attacked nobody, but simply asked standard interview questions, which are obviously foreign to these people who are used to getting on their propaganda sites  and just ripping off lies, conspiracy theories, and accusations with no challenge.

 

Someone should have told Miller and idiot trump that on credible news sites,  interviewees-Dems, Repubs., or what have you, are challenged when they do not tell the truth or make wild accusations and statements. 

 

Defense of Miller’s  behavior is just more justifying of the indefensible. His behavior, like trump’s, was more like that of the knuckle headed school yard bully, than that of a presidential Representative.

 

trump supporters set the bar for their disgusting heros so incredibly low, one wonders how they can show their faces—or monikers-in public. 

 

What a very sad statement these people make about their own standards for rational and acceptable behavior.

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!


Your entire post is based on a major logical flaw - "credible news sites" - that does not describe CNN.


....claimed the poster who swears by Fox and Limblah.....

 

You-just-can't-make-this-stuff-up......


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
Treasured Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

145 Views
Message 43 of 112

rk9152 wrote:

Centristsin2010 wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

MIseker wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

Centristsin2010 wrote:

 

 

You may notice that things started to go off the rail when Tapper got snide about being sure the President was watching and approved. Nope!  That's when Miller jumped the rails.  Maybe Miller should have looked up the term "interview"....like trump Cult Members here, the English dictionary appears to be a foreign object. An interview in this case is where one person asks a question and the other answers the question.  Miller didn't answer any of the questions he was asked....he was clearly there to attack the book and praise his master.  He did it again towards the end and then kicked Miller out. Yep, as Miller continually attempted to fillibuster the interview. Miller was trying to point out


Two answers:

1) Disagree as your theory isn't supported with any facts, but ONLY the biased observation of a trump supporter.  Obviously, you ignored the FACT, Tapper was attempting to get facts from Miller and Miller wasn't going to have any of that.

That assumes that Tapper and CNN did not know what to expect from Miller. Rather offensive to news professionals.  Actually, it assumes nothing other than they expected Miller to not act like an idiot.  Rather offensive to any honest and open-minded Americans...the majority of CNN viewers.

 

 

2) Because Fox sucks-up to anyone/everyone in trumps administration.

But Fox had nothing to do with Tapper, Miller, CNN, or the "interview"..

They have everything to do with sucking up to Miller and those in the administration.


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

134 Views
Message 44 of 112

RK  Miller again showed his inability and lack of ability to have the job that he has. Now, he seems to contradict President Trump in not accepting a comprehension Immigration Reform, What is he doing?  trying now to fill Bannon shoes?

Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

130 Views
Message 45 of 112

phyllisc6781 wrote:

@Cirice—RWNJs  are putting out ridiculous claims and accusations to cover up for the ridiculous freak show put on by Miller- – Nothing less, nothing more.  

 

Anybody who has two eyes and to ears can plainly see and hear that Tapper attacked nobody, but simply asked standard interview questions, which are obviously foreign to these people who are used to getting on their propaganda sites  and just ripping off lies, conspiracy theories, and accusations with no challenge.

 

Someone should have told Miller and idiot trump that on credible news sites,  interviewees-Dems, Repubs., or what have you, are challenged when they do not tell the truth or make wild accusations and statements. 

 

Defense of Miller’s  behavior is just more justifying of the indefensible. His behavior, like trump’s, was more like that of the knuckle headed school yard bully, than that of a presidential Representative.

 

trump supporters set the bar for their disgusting heros so incredibly low, one wonders how they can show their faces—or monikers-in public. 

 

What a very sad statement these people make about their own standards for rational and acceptable behavior.

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!


Your entire post is based on a major logical flaw - "credible news sites" - that does not describe CNN.

Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

129 Views
Message 46 of 112

Cirice wrote:

rk9152 wrote:


I guess we will have to agree to disagree. it is my view that Miller knew Tapper would be attacking the President and Tapper knew that Miller would be defending him.

 

Yes, when attacked, the President fights back. As Obama said, "You don't take a knife to a gunfight".

 

"Snowflake" is a term referring to kids being raised to think they can never lose and are protected from any disappointment (no rewards for excellence since it might make someone else feel bad for example). When  things don't go their way (like an election) they weep and wail and then howl at the moon.


The only thing any of us know for certain is that Miller knew he was there to be interviewed. Period. If he didn't want to answer questions he should have stayed home.

My theory assumes that all parties concerned are professionals and know their business. Yours assumes naivete.

 

Trump fans always say "he fights back when attacked" but the truth is that trump almost always attacks first.

I don't believe that is true. 

 

"Snowflake" is simply a disparaging term for a person who is seen as overly sensitive and fragile. And it fits trump to a t.

No so - "snowflakes" look for "safe spaces", protection and llamas to pet from the school Administrations (for example). Trump fights his own battles 

Now, which rights, exactly, was he standing up for?


 

Report Inappropriate Content
Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

240 Views
Message 47 of 112

@Cirice—RWNJs  are putting out ridiculous claims and accusations to cover up for the ridiculous freak show put on by Miller- – Nothing less, nothing more.  

 

Anybody who has two eyes and to ears can plainly see and hear that Tapper attacked nobody, but simply asked standard interview questions, which are obviously foreign to these people who are used to getting on their propaganda sites  and just ripping off lies, conspiracy theories, and accusations with no challenge.

 

Someone should have told Miller and idiot trump that on credible news sites,  interviewees-Dems, Repubs., or what have you, are challenged when they do not tell the truth or make wild accusations and statements. 

 

Defense of Miller’s  behavior is just more justifying of the indefensible. His behavior, like trump’s, was more like that of the knuckle headed school yard bully, than that of a presidential Representative.

 

trump supporters set the bar for their disgusting heros so incredibly low, one wonders how they can show their faces—or monikers-in public. 

 

What a very sad statement these people make about their own standards for rational and acceptable behavior.

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!

Report Inappropriate Content
Frequent Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

248 Views
Message 48 of 112

rk9152 wrote:


I guess we will have to agree to disagree. it is my view that Miller knew Tapper would be attacking the President and Tapper knew that Miller would be defending him.

 

Yes, when attacked, the President fights back. As Obama said, "You don't take a knife to a gunfight".

 

"Snowflake" is a term referring to kids being raised to think they can never lose and are protected from any disappointment (no rewards for excellence since it might make someone else feel bad for example). When  things don't go their way (like an election) they weep and wail and then howl at the moon.


The only thing any of us know for certain is that Miller knew he was there to be interviewed. Period. If he didn't want to answer questions he should have stayed home.

 

Trump fans always say "he fights back when attacked" but the truth is that trump almost always attacks first.

 

"Snowflake" is simply a disparaging term for a person who is seen as overly sensitive and fragile. And it fits trump to a t.

 

Now, which rights, exactly, was he standing up for?


Assume nothing. Question everything. And start thinking.
Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

234 Views
Message 49 of 112

Centristsin2010 wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

MIseker wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

Centristsin2010 wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/jake-tapper-cuts-off-stephen-miller-after-strange-inter...

 

You may notice that things started to go off the rail when Tapper got snide about being sure the President was watching and approved. Nope!  That's when Miller jumped the rails.  Maybe Miller should have looked up the term "interview"....like trump Cult Members here, the English dictionary appears to be a foreign object. An interview in this case is where one person asks a question and the other answers the question.  Miller didn't answer any of the questions he was asked....he was clearly there to attack the book and praise his master.  He did it again towards the end and then kicked Miller out. Yep, as Miller continually attempted to fillibuster the interview. Miller was trying to point out the President's accomplishments and Tapper didn't ask ONCE, what trumps accomplishments were.  Thanks for proving my point.  and Tapper wanted Miller's "expert" opinion of the topic of mental health.  Another rk lie.....Tapper never asked for Millers "expert" opinion on anything.  Someday, I hope the trump cult members realize they don't have to lie to make their point.  Until then, they'll continue to subject others to FAKE NEWS.

 

Now, I know that there is an obsession on the hate filled left with the President's hindquarters, but let's be honest, Miller is a representative of the President. Naturally he would speak favorably about him.  Now, I know there is an obsession on the hate filled far-right to cover trumps butt, but when your asked to participate in a televised interview, your not being asked to attack the interviewer, the tv network and a book; your were invited to answer questions.  But it's the usual straw crap we see from the usual strawmen.....

 

 


Come on, he was not invited for a fact finding interview and he did not show up to do one. I understand the meaning of the word and I understand that anyone thinking that was what that was supposed to be is extremely naive (or....what is that term.....oh yeah...."intellectually dishonesty").


 


you are correct. anytime a conservative opens their mouth it isnt going to be factual or agree with the type of forum. He sould have been on Fox.

 


Two questions:

1) Does that mean you agree with or disagree with my theory that both sides got what they planned and wanted?

2) What has Fox to do with this?


Two answers:

 

1) Disagree as your theory isn't supported with any facts, but ONLY the biased observation of a trump supporter.  Obviously, you ignored the FACT, Tapper was attempting to get facts from Miller and Miller wasn't going to have any of that.

That assumes that Tapper and CNN did not know what to expect from Miller. Rather offensive to news professionals.

 

2) Because Fox sucks-up to anyone/everyone in trumps administration.

But Fox had nothing to do with Tapper, Miller, CNN, or the "interview"..

 

Thanks for asking.


 

Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

228 Views
Message 50 of 112

ChasKy53 wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

Cirice wrote:

rk9152 wrote:


Tapper was there to attack the President, Miller was there to defend the President - show-biz under the guise of "news".

 

Do you understand the "snowflake" comment?


No, Tapper was there to conduct an interview with Miller about the Michael Wolff book. Miller was  there under the guise of being interviewed about the book, but his real intent was to attack CNN and pump up trump.

 

And yes, I understand the "snowflake" comment. Trump is a thinned-skinned egomaniac who can't accept any amount of criticism. He will attack anyone, at any time, for the even smallest perceived slight. Nevermind that he is almost always the instigator.

 

Now, which rights, exactly, was he standing up for?


I guess we will have to agree to disagree. it is my view that Miller knew Tapper would be attacking the President and Tapper knew that Miller would be defending him.

 

Yes, when attacked, the President fights back. As Obama said, "You don't take a knife to a gunfight".

 

"Snowflake" is a term referring to kids being raised to think they can never lose and are protected from any disappointment (no rewards for excellence since it might make someone else feel bad for example). When  things don't go their way (like an election) they weep and wail and then howl at the moon.


You mean like so many on the Right "weeped , wailed" and then "howled at the moon" when Obama won both of his elections? Now they "weep, wail and howl at the moon" about Mueller investigating their heir trump.


I'm sure you saw the weeping and howling of the left and didn't see anything comparable from the right. So, why do you post that silly stuff?

Report Inappropriate Content