Great Second Careers: Explore How 22 People Over 50 Found Happiness and Success. Read More

Reply
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

114 Views
Message 21 of 111

Cirice wrote:

ChasKy53 wrote:

Cirice wrote:


Not really. My definition is much more accurate. I've never seen snowflake defined as "kids who look for safe spaces, protection and llamas to pet from the school Administrations".

 

Which rights, exactly, was he standing up for?


rk often makes up definitions to suit his own purpose. "Snowflake" is as you defined it - - - - it's not about kids looking for safe places and llamas to pet from school administrations.


I'm beginning to notice that. Does rk often refuse to answer direct questions, too?


Asks more questions in place of answering questions, rather 'trollish' to say the least.


"The only thing man learns from history is man learns nothing from history"
Report Inappropriate Content
Frequent Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

86 Views
Message 22 of 111

ChasKy53 wrote:

Cirice wrote:


Not really. My definition is much more accurate. I've never seen snowflake defined as "kids who look for safe spaces, protection and llamas to pet from the school Administrations".

 

Which rights, exactly, was he standing up for?


rk often makes up definitions to suit his own purpose. "Snowflake" is as you defined it - - - - it's not about kids looking for safe places and llamas to pet from school administrations.


I'm beginning to notice that. Does rk often refuse to answer direct questions, too?


Assume nothing. Question everything. And start thinking.
Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

81 Views
Message 23 of 111

Cirice wrote:

rk9152 wrote:


 

My definition may be narrow but it is accurate. 


Not really. My definition is much more accurate. I've never seen snowflake defined as "kids who look for safe spaces, protection and llamas to pet from the school Administrations".

 

Which rights, exactly, was he standing up for?


rk often makes up definitions to suit his own purpose. "Snowflake" is as you defined it - - - - it's not about kids looking for safe places and llamas to pet from school administrations.


"The only thing man learns from history is man learns nothing from history"
Report Inappropriate Content
Frequent Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

79 Views
Message 24 of 111

rk9152 wrote:


 

My definition may be narrow but it is accurate. 


Not really. My definition is much more accurate. I've never seen snowflake defined as "kids who look for safe spaces, protection and llamas to pet from the school Administrations".

 

Which rights, exactly, was he standing up for?


Assume nothing. Question everything. And start thinking.
Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

93 Views
Message 25 of 111

Centristsin2010 wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

Centristsin2010 wrote:
rk9152 wrote:
Centristsin2010 wrote:
rk9152 wrote:
MIseker wrote:
rk9152 wrote:
Centristsin2010 wrote:

 

 

You may notice that things started to go off the rail when Tapper got snide about being sure the President was watching and approved. Nope!  That's when Miller jumped the rails.  Maybe Miller should have looked up the term "interview"....like trump Cult Members here, the English dictionary appears to be a foreign object. An interview in this case is where one person asks a question and the other answers the question.  Miller didn't answer any of the questions he was asked....he was clearly there to attack the book and praise his master.  He did it again towards the end and then kicked Miller out. Yep, as Miller continually attempted to fillibuster the interview. Miller was trying to point out

Two answers:

1) Disagree as your theory isn't supported with any facts, but ONLY the biased observation of a trump supporter.  Obviously, you ignored the FACT, Tapper was attempting to get facts from Miller and Miller wasn't going to have any of that.

That assumes that Tapper and CNN did not know what to expect from Miller. Rather offensive to news professionals.  Actually, it assumes nothing other than they expected Miller to not act like an idiot.  Rather offensive to any honest and open-minded Americans...the majority of CNN viewers.

 

 

2) Because Fox sucks-up to anyone/everyone in trumps administration.

But Fox had nothing to do with Tapper, Miller, CNN, or the "interview"..

They have everything to do with sucking up to Miller and those in the administration.

Again, both sides were professionals ..... <iller's behavior was FAR from "professional"....a professional shill possibly. a political attacker on one side, a political defender on the other that knew or should have known what was going to happen Really? Yes, "really" otherwise I would not post it.  Tapper should have expected Miller to act like an **bleep** opening?  If you say so. I have no idea what a **bleep** opening is not how a **bleep** opening is supposed to act so I cannot provide you with your much needed answer.  and both agreed to it by their participation.  A dispicable excuse for dispicable behavior. No excuse - simply a statement of fact.

 

Fox lives in your head,  No it doesn't, it lives 24 hours a day on Direct TV channel 350.  Just more lies from rk.... and yet you cannot post about anything without reference to Fox. It has a home there.


 

Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

87 Views
Message 26 of 111

Cirice wrote:

rk9152 wrote:


My theory assumes that all parties concerned are professionals and know their business. Yours assumes naivete.

 

I don't believe that is true. 

 

No so - "snowflakes" look for "safe spaces", protection and llamas to pet from the school Administrations (for example). Trump fights his own battles 

 


 


Your "theory" assumes facts not in evidence.  My statement only assumes that both parties know the meaning of the word "interview".

 

You believe what you want to believe. I believe the evidence.

 

Your definition of "snowflake" is very narrow. It's also inaccurate. "Snowflake" is a disparaging term for a person who is seen as overly sensitive and fragile. Since trump is seen as overly sensitive and fragile, snowflake fits.

 

Now, are you ever going to answer this question? Which rights, exactly, was he standing up for?


My definition may be narrow but it is accurate. 

Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

73 Views
Message 27 of 111

Olderscout66 wrote:

Centristsin2010 wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

rker321 wrote:

RK  Miller again showed his inability and lack of ability to have the job that he has. Now, he seems to contradict President Trump in not accepting a comprehension Immigration Reform, What is he doing?  trying now to fill Bannon shoes?


If his boss is not happy with him, he can fire him. He isn't my concern.


Yep.  Most of his base couldn't careless what jerks the administration is......they just care that his campaign promises are met.  Neither group, his base or his administration has much "class".  that's why they boast about being a "despicable".


This has been the Republican reaction since Reagan traded arms to Iran for hostages and financed their little wars by selling drugs - HE'S ONE OF US, IGNORE IT. Reminds me of all those Fundie saps who get a jolly in "forgiving" their rapist/pedeophile leaders - they're totally TRIBAL

 

Thing is, the rest of us, the significant majority, don't care enough to VOTE and at least get them out of office and back in the deep woods where they belong.

 

Looks like that may FINALLY change in 2018 - Here's hopin'.


The subject is a simple employer/employee situation. How do you manage to get to Reagan, your bias against Fundamental Christians, drugs and who does and does not vote??

Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

58 Views
Message 28 of 111

Centristsin2010 wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

rker321 wrote:

RK  Miller again showed his inability and lack of ability to have the job that he has. Now, he seems to contradict President Trump in not accepting a comprehension Immigration Reform, What is he doing?  trying now to fill Bannon shoes?


If his boss is not happy with him, he can fire him. He isn't my concern.


Yep.  Most of his base couldn't careless what jerks the administration is......they just care that his campaign promises are met.  Neither group, his base or his administration has much "class".  that's why they boast about being a "despicable".


An intelligent person would understand that it has nothing to do with a "base" or campaign promises or class - it is strictly an employer/employee situation.

Report Inappropriate Content
Valued Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

57 Views
Message 29 of 111

MIseker wrote:

rk9152 wrote:

phyllisc6781 wrote:

@Cirice—RWNJs  are putting out ridiculous claims and accusations to cover up for the ridiculous freak show put on by Miller- – Nothing less, nothing more.  

 

Anybody who has two eyes and to ears can plainly see and hear that Tapper attacked nobody, but simply asked standard interview questions, which are obviously foreign to these people who are used to getting on their propaganda sites  and just ripping off lies, conspiracy theories, and accusations with no challenge.

 

Someone should have told Miller and idiot trump that on credible news sites,  interviewees-Dems, Repubs., or what have you, are challenged when they do not tell the truth or make wild accusations and statements. 

 

Defense of Miller’s  behavior is just more justifying of the indefensible. His behavior, like trump’s, was more like that of the knuckle headed school yard bully, than that of a presidential Representative.

 

trump supporters set the bar for their disgusting heros so incredibly low, one wonders how they can show their faces—or monikers-in public. 

 

What a very sad statement these people make about their own standards for rational and acceptable behavior.

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!


Your entire post is based on a major logical flaw - "credible news sites" - that does not describe CNN.


all your posts are based on a major logical flaw. your thinking.

 


How typical - run out of ideas and rather than just hush up - insult a fellow poster.

Report Inappropriate Content
Treasured Social Butterfly

Re: TAPPER CUTS OFF INTERVIEW WITH MILLER; THAT ISN'T THE ONLY THING HE CUT OFF

79 Views
Message 30 of 111

rk9152 wrote:

Centristsin2010 wrote:
rk9152 wrote:
Centristsin2010 wrote:
rk9152 wrote:
MIseker wrote:
rk9152 wrote:
Centristsin2010 wrote:

 

 

You may notice that things started to go off the rail when Tapper got snide about being sure the President was watching and approved. Nope!  That's when Miller jumped the rails.  Maybe Miller should have looked up the term "interview"....like trump Cult Members here, the English dictionary appears to be a foreign object. An interview in this case is where one person asks a question and the other answers the question.  Miller didn't answer any of the questions he was asked....he was clearly there to attack the book and praise his master.  He did it again towards the end and then kicked Miller out. Yep, as Miller continually attempted to fillibuster the interview. Miller was trying to point out

Two answers:

1) Disagree as your theory isn't supported with any facts, but ONLY the biased observation of a trump supporter.  Obviously, you ignored the FACT, Tapper was attempting to get facts from Miller and Miller wasn't going to have any of that.

That assumes that Tapper and CNN did not know what to expect from Miller. Rather offensive to news professionals.  Actually, it assumes nothing other than they expected Miller to not act like an idiot.  Rather offensive to any honest and open-minded Americans...the majority of CNN viewers.

 

 

2) Because Fox sucks-up to anyone/everyone in trumps administration.

But Fox had nothing to do with Tapper, Miller, CNN, or the "interview"..

They have everything to do with sucking up to Miller and those in the administration.

Again, both sides were professionals ..... <iller's behavior was FAR from "professional"....a professional shill possibly.  that knew or should have known what was going to happen Really?  Tapper should have expected Miller to act like an **bleep** opening?  If you say so.  and both agreed to it by their participation.  A dispicable excuse for dispicable behavior.

 

Fox lives in your head,  No it doesn't, it lives 24 hours a day on Direct TV channel 350.  Just more lies from rk....


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content